I am worried to know that you should be so addicted to TikTok these days.
Yours,
Li Hua
Yours,
Li Hua
It was the end of the school year. Mum dropped me off at the school gate and I dashed toward my classroom as usual, without being aware my German Shepherd, Baxter also jumped out of the car and followed me into the school. For fear that I might be late for Mrs. White’s class, I just ignored the strange glances and laughter all the way, thinking they had nothing to do with me, until my best friend Roy yelled anxiously, “Melisa... Baxter behind you.”
I turned around. There he was, with his tongue hanging out and tail wagging happily in the wind. I was rooted on the spot. I wasn’t supposed to bring my dog to school, but at that moment, it was just impossible to get Baxter back.
I lowered myself and tried to get Barter to come closer, but he stared at me for a while, and jumped back. He was waiting for me to take him outside for a walk. Praise is always good, even for a dog, so I said, “Baxter, good boy. Come on now.” Luckily, he ran toward me.
But I could never hide such a naughty dog under my desk. I looked at Roy helplessly, whose eyes suddenly lit up, “The closet (储存室)...”
Yes, the closet. A thrill of excitement ran through my body. There, at the end of the hallway of this building, just on this floor, there was a small unlocked closet where we could safely park Baxter. That was really a perfect idea which would free me from my dilemma.
Then, Roy and I ran desperately back into our classroom. Hardly had we settled down into our seats when Mrs. White came in, books and papers in her hand.
The class went on smoothly. Mrs. White explained some rules patiently and reminded us to take notes. I listened attentively. Then something went wrong. When Mrs. White began to write some math problems on the blackboard, quietly, a dog slid in. It was Baxter. Mrs. White turned around, frozen with shock. “Whose dog is it?”
2. 请按如下格式在答题卡的相应位置作答。
At this time, Baxter spotted me and ran toward me excitedly.
I had thought Mrs, White wouldn’t get away with it.
Belfast is a peculiarly religious community. This may be said of the whole of the North of Ireland. About one-half of the people are convinced Protestants (清教徒) and the other half Catholics (天主教徒). Each party does all it can
Every man in the community acts like a minister and carries a brick to argue against
One of Belfast's local jokes was very good. It referred to the uniform and inevitable fine of forty shillings and costs for uttering a party cry--and it is no economical fine for a poor man, either, by the way. They say that a policeman found a drunken man lying on the ground, up a dark alley,
“What’s that you say?”
“To hell with!”
“To hell with who? To hell with what?”
“Ah, ye can finish it yourself--it's too expensive for me!”
I think the seditious disposition (倾向), restrained by the economical instinct, is finely put in that.
Pride and Defeat
I had always prided myself on my talent in debates and arguments. Thus, when I was selected to represent the school in the national debate series, I was naturally confident of my readiness for the task Little did I know that this would turn out to be one of the most important lessons in my life.
The run-up to the finals was a breeze for my team. Our teacher was very experienced and we were all good speakers. My teammates were open to communicate so we showed perfect teamwork. But I was undoubtedly the most outstanding. In each round, the judges had always selected me as the best speaker. This means that my confidence was at an all-time high by the time we found ourselves with one week to train before the finals. I had no reason to even think that I would not be voted the overall best speaker for the debate series.
Unfortunately, I began to get self-focused about the whole business and started putting on airs with my teammates. I saw myself as the natural debater who would be let down by their bad performance. I became so dissatisfied that I began missing practices, which disappointed my kind teammates and teacher. They had no choice but to continue their training schedule.
The day of the finals dawned bright and fine. Actually, I just passed my teammates to enter the hall of the debate finals, feeling the excitement of being able to finally show off my debating power. But the reality was something quite different. My absence from the practices had created a gap between my teammates and me. We could not work perfectly as we did previously. Instead, our teamwork was so bad that even our school supporters were shamed into silence. When it was my turn to conclude as the last speaker of the team, the hall was quiet. Everyone knew that I was the most likely to win the overall best speaker for the series.
But as I launched into my speech. I knew that things were very wrong.
Suddenly, one of my teammates came up and patted me on the shoulder.
As a liberal arts teacher, it is my more often average to find myself obligated(不得不) to speak to my students about books that I haven’t read,
As a result of such all-too-familiar situations, I believe I am well positioned, if not to offer any real lesson on
Admit it or not, we still live in a society, on the decline though it may be,
To speak without shame about books we haven’t read, we would thus need to free ourselves of the oppressive image of cultural literacy
If at first you don’t succeed, as the old saying goes, try, try again. Good advice, up to a point. But let me offer a
Consider the advice for job interviews in Talent, a new book by economist Tyler Cowen and venture capitalist Daniel Gross. They suggest asking a(n)
Indeed, one way to describe this tactic is that the interviewer is asking for answers in
While that approach is
A striking example of parallel design is the creation of the Windows 95 startup sound. Microsoft was looking for an opportunity to
Eno recalls receiving a brief, asking for music that was “inspirational, sexy, driving, provocative, nostalgic... there were about 150
Eno describes himself as being “completely bereft of ideas” at the time. He found the brief both hilarious and inspiring. In the end he
Bill Burnett and Dave Evans, in their delightful book Designing Your Life, suggest an exercise in which you sketch out a vision for the next five years of your life. What will you be doing? Where will you live and with whom? Are you hoping to run a marathon? Start a business? Write a novel?
This is often a straightforward act of
I’ve tried this myself and seen others try it. People squirm. They protest. Sometimes they cry. And then, sooner or later, the ideas start pouring out.
We all contain
A.suggestion | B.promotion | C.recommendation | D.modification |
A.routine | B.academic | C.personal | D.controversial |
A.presented | B.exhausted | C.challenged | D.accepted |
A.style | B.parallel | C.detail | D.privacy |
A.fundamental | B.flexible | C.unconventional | D.practical |
A.distinct | B.determined | C.deliberate | D.vain |
A.dismiss | B.restrict | C.explore | D.overlook |
A.inevitably | B.accidentally | C.theoretically | D.eventually |
A.scale up | B.figure out | C.experiment on | D.show off |
A.adjectives | B.statements | C.variables | D.copyrights |
A.purchased | B.composed | C.performed | D.appreciated |
A.exhibited | B.created | C.broke | D.underestimated |
A.aggressiveness | B.imagination | C.wisdom | D.will |
A.dart | B.score | C.drawing | D.notice |
A.emotions | B.ambitions | C.desires | D.multitudes |
Happy Class Break
For as long as there have been gifts, we naturally make choices based on the recipient (接受者). But what if we have been wrong all along and that we could turn things around, which not only made gift buying easier, but the recipient happier?
In 2015, psychologists Lauren Human and Lara Aknin conducted an online survey, which suggested that when people buy gifts, they prefer to choose something based on the recipient’s personality and tastes. Most people also said that they preferred receiving gifts bought with them in mind: gifts for them.
But Human and Aknin wondered if this approach to giving failed to take advantage of the way we connect as people. So they sent 78 volunteers into a shopping centre before Mother’s Day. Half were told to buy a card that “reveals(揭示) your knowledge of the recipient” while the others set out to buy a card that “reveals your true self”. After the purchase, the givers who had thought partly of themselves reported feeling emotionally closer to their mothers.
To find out how that approach goes down with recipients, the psychologists did another test, asking more than 100 students to choose a song on iTunes to give to a friend, partner or family member. Each half of the group received the same instructions as the card buyers. Results revealed that recipients of songs that revealed something of the givers felt closer to them than those who received gifts bought only with them in mind.
Human and Aknin suggest it might apply to all gifts. “If building stronger social connections is the underlying (潜在的) goal” of a gift and surely it should be—then we “may well be advised to offer more self-reflective gifts”. In short, for a present to be meaningful, you need to give away a bit of yourself, even if there is a risk that the gift might not so closely suit the recipient’s practical needs or tastes as one acquired purely with that in mind.
Moreover, giving something of oneself can be a safer act, the psychologists added. Because it reduces the risk of revealing poor knowledge of a recipient by attempting to buy something that fits their character—and failing.
But a note of caution here: what the research does not examine is the potential risk in repeated, unsympathetic giver-centered giving, which, according to Human and Aknin “could signal self-obsession” —and nobody wants to reveal that about themselves.
1.From the Mother’s Day card test, we can conclude that ________.A.gifts chosen with the giver in mind work well on the giver |
B.most people choose gifts with the recipient in mind |
C.most people choose gifts based on their personal tastes |
D.gifts chosen with the giver in mind work well on the recipient |
A.The recipients; the givers. | B.The givers; the recipients. |
C.The givers; the givers. | D.The recipients; the recipients. |
A.Making the giver’s life happier. |
B.Showing one’s knowledge of the recipient. |
C.Establishing and strengthening social connections. |
D.Meeting the recipient’s practical needs. |
A.Choose gifts that reflect more of yourself. |
B.Just focus on your own tastes when choosing gifts. |
C.Buy something that fits the recipient’s character most. |
D.Be careful not to signal your true personality. |
A.The tradition of gift giving. | B.The purpose of gift giving. |
C.The effect of gift giving. | D.The psychology of gift giving. |